As I watch all of these word games I’m taken back to so many selling situations of the past in our industry where the truth was never a necessity to make the sale, and smoke and mirrors pricing was the gold standard for the incentive sales reps that made a substantial living on clouding the issue with unsuspecting buyers. It seemed that the more you told the truth, the more the buyer didn’t believe you and the more you lost the business. It seemed that buyers bought what they wanted to buy, with little consideration of their own facts. The incentive program graveyard is loaded with programs that cost a lot of money, produced nothing for the client and put more of the program budget into the hands of the award supplier than the participants of the program. It’s was not uncommon for a program buyer to pay $500 for an award that could be purchased at retail for $200, or spend a million dollars on a travel program that might motivate 2-5% of their participant base and convince themselves that truly 100% of the participants were motivated to improve their performance. Unfortunately that still happens today.
So can the incentive reps of today be compared to all those presidential candidates who will say and do about anything to get elected? Sure they can, and they do. But it’s not really their fault that they do it, they‘re just trying to make a living the best way they know and the whole truth be damned when it lies in the way of making the sale.
Does the fault lies with the buyer? Should they be in a position to buy incentives before they understand all the nuances and principles of the award industry? Should they know when to use what kinds of awards at what times and in what variation to motivate performance pending all the facts at their disposal? Should know exactly what they want to accomplish and how they intend to measure that achievement before they begin? Should they know how to communicate their objectives and use communications to bolster their efforts? If they are going to buy fulfillment should they know what companies are the best at fulfilling that need? If they don’t really have a clue of how to structure their program should they know what consultants to call upon to provide that assistance? Unfortunately, in all too many cases the buyers don’t. And in those cases they end up with programs that wind up in the incentive graveyard mentioned above.
The industry at one time had many terrific consultative types who had the expertise to guide clients in the right direction. Those kinds of folks, like our friend PaulHebert of i2i who still provides that expertise, are unfortunately harder and harder to find today. “Caveat Emptor”, or Let the Buyer Beware” is a saying that has been around for years. It applies in spades to buyers of incentive award programs, but it shouldn’t preclude them for knowing all they can about what it is that they are buying. If they don’t want to take the time to learn they will be fair game for those incentive reps who revel in the game and “truthfulness” of presidential politics.
